WEST EUROPEAN UNION |
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
January 2011 a seminar was organized by the Dutch unit of European Movement in order to discuss the consequences of the coming abolition of the WEU and with that, the European Security and Defence-Assemblee (final session was on 10 May 2011), the quality of democratic control on European defence policy and the significance of the European Parliament.
The basis for the WEU was laid down March 1948 in order to design a new European institution to contribute to peace and stability and to the development of the European security and defence architecture. It is a treaty concerning economic, social and cultural cooperation and collective self-defence. 39 Countries have the right to send delegates to the Assemblee. The importance of the WEU has never been major. Almost all the tasks were delegated to the European Union, including the Petersberg tasks. These tasks were incorporated in the Treaty on European Union. It is a list of military and security priorities incorporated within the EU's Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The European Security and Defence Assemblee of the WEU offered national members of parliament from the member states of the EU the opportunity to become informed and consulted about the European Security and Defence Policy. The role of the Assemblee strongly depended on the development of a European foreign policy and defence capacity. |
March 2010 it was decided to abolish the organisation in July 2011 at the latest (see statement below). Abolition, however, carries responsibilities. Duties will disappear, assigned, delegated and deputed. The NATO cannot take over all the duties. Civil side for instance is an example.
Till now, national parliaments did send delegates to the Assembly. After the abolition, this procedure will disappear, MEP'S could become in place, through which national parliaments will loose their (direct) contacts and influence. The EU took a great step by establishing the HR and EDEO, through the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty. This treaty is used to create a body that execute security and defence policy. But is their a real common European Security and Defence Policy? Who is going to decide after the abolition about strategic interests of the Union? It is important that national parliaments hold their possibility to consult and to use power. On the other hand, a common European foreign policy is hardly unthinkable and allows in fact no national policies. But not all member states execute the same policy. There are 2 member states with nuclear weapons and there are member states, which are not a member of the NATO (Austria and Ireland). So, what approach? Community acquis of intergovernmental? |
|
National parliaments should keep their influence and their say on common European Security and Defence Policy and sent delegates in order to come to conclusions and results. European Parliament made up their committee on CSDP. This committee should search for liason with national parliaments. |
Statement of the Presidency of the Permanent Council of the WEU
on behalf of the High Contracting Parties to the Modified Brussels Treaty – Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.
The Western European Union has made an important contribution to peace and stability in Europe and to the development of the European security and defence architecture, promoting consultations and cooperation in this field, and conducting operations in a number of theatres, including Petersberg tasks (*). |
The Petersberg tasks cover a great range of possible military missions, ranging from the most simple to the most robust military intervention. They are formulated as humanitarian and rescue tasks, peacekeeping tasks and tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking.
Officially, the range of tasks the EU commits itself to "includes" the above, but is not limited to them. In practice, the task of territorial defence is considered the domain of NATO. As many European countries are fervent supporters of NATO, there are many provisions to prevent competition with NATO. |
|